【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 3首钢琴曲(1966-1967)
合集 · 新音乐 (41)
-
【钢琴】梁雷 - 我的窗(1996-2007)
11:59
-
【吉他】梁雷 - 欲望之旅(2009)
10:11
-
【琵琶与弦乐】梁雷 - 五季(2010)
17:22
-
【钢琴】贝里奥 - 五段变奏曲(1952-1953)
7:42
-
【长笛】贝里奥 - 序列 之一(1958)
5:45
-
【钢琴】贝里奥 - 6首安可曲(1965-1990)
12:51
-
【女声】贝里奥 - 序列 之三(1965)
9:01
-
【钢琴】贝里奥 - 序列 之四(1965-1966)
11:03
-
【钢琴】贝里奥 - 奏鸣曲(2001)
23:25
-
【钢琴】拉亨曼 - 舒伯特主题变奏曲(1956)
7:55
-
【钢琴】拉亨曼 - 摇篮音乐(1963)
12:40
-
【弦乐】拉亨曼 - 第一弦乐四重奏“大体”(1971/1976/1988)
23:32
-
【弦乐】拉亨曼 - 第二弦乐四重奏“精灵之舞”(1988-1989)
27:37
-
【弦乐】拉亨曼 - 第三弦乐四重奏“呐喊”(2001-2002)
25:32
-
【钢琴】拉亨曼 - 刮葫(1969/1988)
4:43
-
【钢琴】拉亨曼 - 小夜曲(1997-1998)
1:01:22
-
【钢琴】拉亨曼 - 致命进行曲(2016-2017)
5:40
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 6首警句(1966)
8:52
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 3首钢琴曲(1966-1967)
18:15
-
【弦乐】芬尼豪 - 弦乐四重奏奏鸣曲(1967)
42:07
-
【弦乐】芬尼豪 - 第二弦乐四重奏(1979-1980)
10:51
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 引理-图标-警句(1981)
56:24
-
【短笛】芬尼豪 - 上标(1981)
5:10
-
【小提琴】芬尼豪 - 恰空风格间奏曲(1986)
10:16
-
【弦乐】芬尼豪 - 第三弦乐四重奏(1986-1987)
20:03
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 违背自然的作品(2000)
16:39
-
【弦乐】芬尼豪 - 第五弦乐四重奏(2006)
15:12
-
【弦乐】芬尼豪 - 第六弦乐四重奏(2010)
23:59
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 奎尔(2011-2013)
27:33
-
【钢琴】芬尼豪 - 卡拉布里亚国王(2018)
2:40
-
【钢琴】富勒 - 练习曲(2011)
6:11
-
【钢琴】富勒 - 幻影(2002)
23:46
-
【钢琴】布列兹 - 12首记谱法(1945)
9:47
-
【钢琴】布列兹 - 草稿片段(1987)
0:33
-
【钢琴】布列兹 - 插值(1994/2001)
10:03
-
【钢琴】厄特沃什 - 地之琴—天之琴(第二版)(2003/2006)
2:45
-
【钢琴】桑德斯 - 影(2013)
11:42
-
【钢琴】桑德斯 - to an utterance(2020)
11:15
-
【竖琴、锣与低音提琴】谢尔西 - Okanagon(1968)
8:44
-
【钢琴】平彻 - whirling tissue of light(2013)
9:33
-
【声乐】诺诺 - 贾米拉·布帕查(1962)
5:01
Description
Brian Ferneyhough - Three Pieces for Piano (1966-1967) 布莱恩·芬尼豪 - 3首钢琴曲(1966-1967) 00:01 - I 03:36 - II 11:29 - III Ian Pace, piano 伊安·佩斯,钢琴 Preface (Brian Fernyehough) Even though these three movements are highly contrasted in almost every respect I was very concerned with gradually revealing a larger unifying formal motion manifesting itself through the increasingly insistent emergence of static, iterative textures marshalled into massive self-enclosed blocks. On this level, the overall tendency is thus a sense of increasing entropy countered, in part, by the evolution of the nervous, evasive flickerings characterising the first movement into more consistently stable (and thus recognizable) textures. At the outset, all levels of articulation – alignment of tempo and figure, register, degree of transformation – are mobilized in the service of an urgently energized and mercurial field. In the second piece, the longest, this type of activity is progressively degraded by the unexpected incursion of brutally invariant chordal blows. The ambiguous, unremitting encounter of these incompatible materials gives rise to a form in which disballace, frustration and unpredictability are the norm. I see a sort of “negative resolution” being achieved in the third movement, in that all types of activity, whatever their putative origin, are held forcibly isolated from one another, almost as if they belonged in distinct, mutually incomprehensible universes of discourse.