Description
逛博物馆,从巴黎到乌鲁木齐,都写着同一句话:丝绸之路,是汉武帝的功劳
但历史学家发现:这个说法,一半对,一半错
真正的"丝绸之路交流",比汉朝早了整整两千年
▸ 早在汉朝出现前两千年,小麦、粟就已经在欧亚之间"跨洲旅行"
▸ 真正的搬运工,是骑着马穿越中亚山地的游牧民族
▸ 罗马人的餐桌上,就有来自中国北方的谷物
▸ 汉朝的贡献,是"修路设防"——让丝绸贸易变得可行,但"连接"本身,早就存在了
历史上最重要的主角,常常是那些没留下名字、也没建起纪念碑的人。我们习惯记住皇帝,却忘了真正把世界连起来的,是草原上的马蹄。
—— 你还知道哪些"被张冠李戴"的历史功劳?评论区聊聊
【帝国真相】撕掉历史的滤镜,跟着 Richard Payne 教授,重新认识那些你以为早就懂了的"常识"
关注不迷路,我们下期见
🎬 本账号非搬运:内容由教授本人原创,国内团队负责制作发布;教授也会不定期"空降"评论区回复大家!
From Paris to Urumqi, the museum placards all say the same thing: the Silk Road was Emperor Wu of Han's achievement. Historians have found that this is only half true
Real "Silk Road exchange" started a full two thousand years before the Han:
▸ Two thousand years before the Han dynasty, wheat and millet were already crossing continents between Europe and Asia
▸ The real carriers were nomads on horseback, crossing the mountains of Central Asia
▸ Grain from northern China had already reached Roman dinner tables
▸ The Han built roads and garrisons, which made the silk trade workable. The connection itself was already there
History's most important players are often the ones who left no names and built no monuments. We remember the emperors and forget that the world was stitched together by hoofbeats on the steppe.
— What other historical achievements have been credited to the wrong people? Tell us in the comments
【Empire Unfiltered】Strip away the filters on history. Join Professor Richard Payne as he takes a fresh look at the "common knowledge" you thought you already understood. Follow so you don't miss the next one. See you next episode
🎬 Not a repost: all content is the professor's original work, produced and published by our team in China. The professor also drops into the comments now and then to reply!
Comments
省流:小麦西来说、马车西来说[doge]
♥ 586 ↩ 107
耐着性子看完了,觉得非常怪,但是再让他发几期看看不对劲再骂
♥ 195 ↩ 17
丝绸之路是东西方商品贸易路线,不是一条路,哪来的什么修建
♥ 178 ↩ 26
课本也没说过“修建丝绸之路”,说的是“张骞联通西域各国,开辟丝绸之路”
♥ 128 ↩ 26
就西方考古史,不是作假,就是夸大。瞧一乐就好了。
♥ 115 ↩ 17
对于这种视频我的看法是这样子的:
♥ 98
这玩意又不是一条马路,哪来的修建?
♥ 98 ↩ 2
4000年前,罗马从中国进口谷物?[doge]你整点荔枝吃也行啊?你进口小麦和粟干啥,至于吗?
♥ 92 ↩ 63
只有我在纠结封面那句“课本骗了你两千年”有多搞笑吗?[滑稽]
♥ 92 ↩ 2
就学西方总想把官方建设的东西,给强行加到某些人和地方上去,就不想承认没有官方组织,个人力量根本无法完成某些大型项目完成,就很无语,按他们无限细分的逻辑,那远古还一样有交流呐,那怎么算
♥ 89 ↩ 12
按照这个逻辑的话,哥伦布也不是发现新大陆的第一人。美洲早在冰河时代就和欧亚大陆有技术交流了
♥ 78 ↩ 8
幽默白胡
♥ 66
所以你的意思是没有一个愿意经商的强力国家政府支持,就能形成稳定的民间经商环境,还能让游牧民族自发依靠商业游牧养活部族?懂了,匈奴帝国和蒙古帝国才是真正的丝绸之路帝国啊[星星眼][星星眼][星星眼]
♥ 64 ↩ 10
我感觉丝绸之路这个词政治意味更重吧,历史里是指代中西方贸易但不能说完全代表,基于此来看这个词的诞生就是服务于张骞出西域。
♥ 57 ↩ 6
丝绸之路的功不是记在某一个人或国家身上,它是一条接力式商路,中国—中亚—波斯—中东—欧洲,各国都为维持丝绸之路出过力
♥ 55 ↩ 3
如果只谈连接本身,那也不是游牧民族专利,全人类的共同作用,只是古代中亚游牧刚好在强大文明之间,而且有马交流效率相对更高罢了
♥ 52 ↩ 1
游牧民族搬运小麦和粟?抢得太多吃不完吗?
♥ 50 ↩ 7
确实是游牧民族先发现的这条道路,但是真正将它规范成一套贸易体系的还得等到汉朝吧
♥ 49
为什么叫丝绸之路,而不叫香料之路,馕之路[歪嘴]。
♥ 47 ↩ 9
哥伦布发现新大陆 新大陆不用被发现 人家有原住民
♥ 47 ↩ 2