反直觉的死刑民意：谁在支持/反对？为什么？

合集 · 聊聊国际法 (67)

Description
特别提示：本视频完全「不」涉及「是否应该废除死刑」这一问题，而是关注死刑相关民意的实际情况——当然，所谓的「实际情况」是基于众多已发表的国内外研究成果，并进行合理分析，不代表一定是绝对的「客观真实」。不过，我认为这已经是基于最新且可靠的调查所作出的合理判断，当仍然欢迎大家从各种角度批评指正或发表看法。最后，和往常一样，我从不删除评论，所有评论的消失由叔叔负责。
————
参考文献：
武汉大学刑事法研究中心：中国死刑态度调研报告
申家强：论中国死刑的发展趋势
高铭暄：略论中国刑法中的死刑替代措施
梁根林、陈尔彦：中国死刑民意：测量、解构与沟通
刘春花：向死而生：中国死刑制度改革的政治抉择
胡云腾：存与废———死刑基本理论研究
杨宇冠：《公民及政治权利国际公约》中文作准本问题研究
赵军：死刑存废的民意维度——以组织卖淫罪可罚性观念的测量为中心
公民权利和政治权利国际公约
 2020. ‘Death Sentences and Executions 2019’. 
Ancel, Marc. 1968. ‘Part I. Report, 1960’. Capital Punishment. United Nations Publication Sales No.: E.67.IV.15.
Economic and Social Council. 2015. E/2015/49. ‘Capital Punishment and Implementation of The Safeguards Guaranteeing Protection of The Rights of Those Facing the Death Penalty.’ United Nations.
Hood, Roger. 2009. ‘Abolition of The Death Penalty: China in World Perspective’. City University of Hong Kong Law Review 1 (1): 1-21. 
Hood, Roger. 2012. ‘Enhancing EU Action on The Death Penalty in Asia’. Belgium: European Union.
Jiao, Yang. 2017. ‘China’s Criminal Law Reform from the Perspective of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. The Journal of Human Rights Vol. 16 No. 2. pp.181-192.
Qin, Q., Li, Z., & Jiao, X. 2021. Public Opinion on the Death Penalty in Mainland China and Taiwan. China Report, 57(3), 327–345.
Sato, Mai. and Bacon, Paul. 2015. ’The Public Opinion Myth: Why Japan retains the death penalty.’ The Death Penalty Project. p.24.
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 
United Nations. 1977. Resolution 32/61 Capital Punishment.
United Nations. 1989. Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty. United Nations Treaty Series , vol. 1642, p.414.
A/RES/77/222
A/77/463/Add.2
E/2015/49